Chicago vs Fresno

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Illinois salaries · California salaries

Living in Chicago vs Fresno

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Chicago has a housing index of 112 while Fresno sits at 111 (national average = 100). The median home in Chicago costs $310,000 compared to $330,000 in Fresno, a difference of $20,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,700 in Chicago versus $1,300 in Fresno.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Chicago scores 104 while Fresno scores 101. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Chicago (101) are higher than Fresno (100). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Chicago is $62,097 compared to $53,838 in Fresno. When adjusted for cost of living, purchasing power is similar in both cities.

Relocating: Chicago vs Fresno

If you are considering a move between Chicago (index: 107) and Fresno (index: 107), the 0% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Fresno is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Chicago can afford $1,449/month, while the median household in Fresno can afford $1,256/month. With median homes at $310,000 in Chicago versus $330,000 in Fresno, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $1,700/month in Chicago and $1,300/month in Fresno, renters save significantly in Fresno. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes about equally far in both cities. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Chicago (107) vs Fresno (107)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Chicago at 107 is 7% above the US average, while Fresno at 107 is 7% above average. Both cities are close to the national average in overall costs.

Chicago and Fresno land within 0 points of each other on the composite index (107 vs 107), so the overall cost picture is similar. Transportation shows the widest single-category margin at 116 versus 109, making it the area where residents will feel the most day-to-day price difference between Chicago and Fresno. Housing costs are comparable between the two metros, with Chicago at 112 and Fresno at 111 on the housing sub-index and median home prices of $310,000 and $330,000 respectively. Neither city is cheaper across the board: Chicago has an edge in utilities, while Fresno is more affordable for housing and groceries. Your actual savings depend on which categories consume the biggest share of your personal budget.

For renters: With median rents of $1,700/month in Chicago and $1,300/month in Fresno, the annual rent difference is approximately $4,800. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $24,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $20,000 difference in median home prices between Chicago and Fresno translates to roughly $1,200 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links