Chicago vs Lubbock

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Illinois salaries · Texas salaries

Living in Chicago vs Lubbock

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Chicago has a housing index of 112 while Lubbock sits at 59 (national average = 100). The median home in Chicago costs $310,000 compared to $175,000 in Lubbock, a difference of $135,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,700 in Chicago versus $950 in Lubbock.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Chicago scores 104 while Lubbock scores 93.

Healthcare costs in Chicago (101) are higher than Lubbock (90).

Median household income in Chicago is $62,097 compared to $49,834 in Lubbock. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Lubbock.

Relocating: Chicago vs Lubbock

If you are considering a move between Chicago (index: 107) and Lubbock (index: 83), the 22% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Lubbock is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Chicago can afford $1,449/month, while the median household in Lubbock can afford $1,163/month. With median homes at $310,000 in Chicago versus $175,000 in Lubbock, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $1,700/month in Chicago and $950/month in Lubbock, renters save significantly in Lubbock. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Lubbock where costs are 17% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Chicago (107) vs Lubbock (83)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Chicago at 107 is 7% above the US average, while Lubbock at 83 is 17% below average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

Chicago costs meaningfully more than Lubbock, with a 24-point composite gap that translates to real differences in rent, groceries, and daily expenses. The biggest category divergence is housing, where Chicago scores 112 and Lubbock scores 59. That 53-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors Lubbock with indices of 59 versus 112. Median home prices of $310,000 in Chicago and $175,000 in Lubbock underscore this gap.

For renters: With median rents of $1,700/month in Chicago and $950/month in Lubbock, the annual rent difference is approximately $9,000. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $45,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $135,000 difference in median home prices between Chicago and Lubbock translates to roughly $8,100 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links