Chicago vs Tulsa

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Illinois salaries · Oklahoma salaries

Living in Chicago vs Tulsa

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Chicago has a housing index of 112 while Tulsa sits at 63 (national average = 100). The median home in Chicago costs $310,000 compared to $175,000 in Tulsa, a difference of $135,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,700 in Chicago versus $950 in Tulsa.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Chicago scores 104 while Tulsa scores 95. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Chicago (101) are higher than Tulsa (91).

Median household income in Chicago is $62,097 compared to $48,278 in Tulsa. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Tulsa.

Relocating: Chicago vs Tulsa

If you are considering a move between Chicago (index: 107) and Tulsa (index: 85), the 21% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Tulsa is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Chicago can afford $1,449/month, while the median household in Tulsa can afford $1,126/month. With median homes at $310,000 in Chicago versus $175,000 in Tulsa, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $1,700/month in Chicago and $950/month in Tulsa, renters save significantly in Tulsa. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Tulsa where costs are 15% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Chicago (107) vs Tulsa (85)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Chicago at 107 is 7% above the US average, while Tulsa at 85 is 15% below average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

Chicago costs meaningfully more than Tulsa, with a 22-point composite gap that translates to real differences in rent, groceries, and daily expenses. The biggest category divergence is housing, where Chicago scores 112 and Tulsa scores 63. That 49-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors Tulsa with indices of 63 versus 112. Median home prices of $310,000 in Chicago and $175,000 in Tulsa underscore this gap.

For renters: With median rents of $1,700/month in Chicago and $950/month in Tulsa, the annual rent difference is approximately $9,000. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $45,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $135,000 difference in median home prices between Chicago and Tulsa translates to roughly $8,100 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links